Incoming Red Flag 4.0

Publicado 30 de Agosto del 201312 a

Al parecer, HOY (día 30/08/13) soltarán la definitiva... bien hasta que empiece podemos ir poniendo aquí algunas cosillas, luego recordad el hilo privado para operaciones. Allí abriremos uno para ir haciendo nuestro "juego", nuestra táctica. Si en FOL se organiza algo que valga la pena, como hizo Neptune en el BFS, tal vez nos metamos, luego entonces también deberemos cumplir nuestro "deber" de informar de los vuelos allí, pero lo que sí podríamos mirar de hacer, en todo caso (sobre todo para nuestra gente, tanto para los que puedan volar no tanto como otros como para los que se han quedado fuera) es informar en nuestro hilo privado. Así, poniendo un "resumen" simple (a lo Korea PVP, recordáis? ) se va motivando a la peña, siguen la guerra, y nosotros, volemos o no, sabemos qué y cómo se está atacando por nuestra parte, para darle "continuidad" a la cosa qué os parece?

Bueno, aquí, otra buena noticia:

6. Has the invisible Wing-Element Invisible Jet exploit been dealt with? (Flight lead 80Nm away cheat)
--> COB's Question

As far as i know the "ghost bug" has been addressed by BMS, but to what extend (80nm) i can not answer actually as i dont know. Good question, worth investigating once again. EDIT: This issue has been fixed

Y algunas cosas más... Esto es un resumen de las cosas más importante de las 12 páginas de comentarios de la RedFlag en su versión beta:

8. Are AI going to be flying over the FLOT? Will the extend over enemy territory? Will they strike Airbases?

Abosolutly NOT or better to say very limited. The mission planing of the AI is completly new compared to previous versions and way more sophisticated and organized. I dont want to spill the beans, but one can obsverse the logic and the timings of those analysing the ATO. A usefull thing

to do actually if one wants to utilize his "environment" and coordinate with the AIs. AIs also dont strike Airbases, no. This part has been left open for humans only. Furthermore AIs have a risk-management...if a mission is too risky to be planed..or becomes too risky while being executed...they will abort. To answer your question more directly... suicide missions like Bombers penetrating enemy airspace waay too depp without any protection ...wont happen.

10. Will sides be manually balanced if needed?
-->COB's Question

If your question means that, if the war will be manually manipulated while it is running. Absolutly not, that would be cheating.

The war is designed in a fashion that it is "more" dynamic than before...but again..i dont want to spill the beans here.

If your question means that, if we will try to balance the human teams on both sides BEFORE a round starts so its more exciting... yes we will contact teams/pilots and ask them to switch sides if this step is resonable.

11. Will the AI attack bridges? If all bridges are destroyed and ground unit movement is completely stagnant, will the server be manually fixed?

Good question indeed. I can see you understand certain dynamic problematics aswell. No, AIs will not destroy bridges, this is up to the humans. Bridges have (depening on classification or size) ...repair-times from 36 to 72 hours +/- random value.

12. Will we get the airbrake beeping sound in this campaign?
-->Sobe's Question

Redflag 4.0 comes with a complete new sound-package (mostly done by Demo with little improvements by me) and the airbrake "beep" sound will not be available, but you wont need it

REGISTERED SO FAR:

255 RED / 212 BLUE = Total 467

[esto fue modificado por...] --> 249 RED / 218 BLUE = Total 467

Now i waited till an Arilift plane actually air-dropped (in RF they airdrop and dont land) supplies over THAT base...and checked if the new tasked Su-32s had re-filled stores.

YAAAY, THEY DID HAVE! Phantastic... Airlifts really work in BMS (even with empty stores themself) and are not "placebos" and my concerns were calmed again, puuh. That s tactically important to intercept airlifts and to cut of thier weapon-supplies for squadrons.

Aint that cool if groundunits with capture orders are coordinated with CAS fligths watching over them, whereas
the FAC recon plane is on station time ahead followed by A-10s in an "active repsonse distance" just waiting for targets to be called by FAC

Kema mira, al final te hicieron caso...

As suggestions where made that the airdefesense "appear or feel" more aggressive in Redflag compared to stock (i hope so, because i put alot of work, fixing and testing in it), but as some also said it is STILL to easy to kill them even with Shrikes, the final version will have Patriots and S-10s having better overlapping coverage areas around the FLOT with the most forward frontline SAMs.

Esto sí que mola... Weasel en estado puro... :chulo: la única pregunta es... y ahora todos saben la posición de nuestros sams?? :lol2:

Last second surprise

SAMs of the opposing forces will be completly HIDDEN from 2D and one will not see many or none ADA low and high threat-circles either.

You have a full picture about your own SAMs, but it will be a task to reveal the locations of the SAMs of the enemy using all available intel data. Teamwork !

The Preplaned Threat Steerpoints (PPT) in Redflag represent the ACTUAL engage range of each airdefense PLUS 25% safety-zone.

In example: If a SAM would launch at 10nm max its according PPT would be 12,5nm

Reportar

Publicado 30 de Agosto del 201312 a

Mañana empieza la fiesta. No veo aun que se pueda descargar el teatro...

Reportar